Sunday, April 3, 2011

Diya ghuma ke!! : India - ODI 0World Champs 2011

ah, where do we start? The numbers? The facts? The series of events that led to this moment? or just the sheer intesnity of the tidal wave of emotions sweeping through a billion-plus hearts? April 2nd, 2011 will be forever etched in the memories of a generation, scratching out the agony of March 23rd, 2003, as the world saw a Demi-God's destiny fulfilled, a nation's pride restored, one leader with his beliefs vindicated. Two images shall be engraved on the minds canvas: "EL CAPITAN"'s finish with an exclamation point - the winning six , and the victory lap with the Demi-God, misty eyed and hoisted on the shoulders of GenNext.

over a span of six weeks, we've seen an epic unfold before out very eyes. been through the depths of hapless despair, ridden crests of ecstasy and witnessed the reprise of a sublime talent who looked all but lost in the wilderness just a few months back. that is another testament to the nous of one MS Dhoni, who before the campaign kicked off, had sounded off the warning about Yuvraj being a dangerous player who knows how to excel in a long tournament. Just watch out if Yuvi gets a couple of fifties, he had said, and was he proven right or what! 4 man-of-the match performances, 4 fifties, 15 wickets and one World Cup final chase-finish later, Yuvraj Singh stands as the Man of the tournament, at the culmination of one of the most extraordinary redemptions in world cricket.

and Yuvraj in turn, had announced that he was playing the world cup for someone special. Who could be more special than the Demi-God himdelf! In his sixth world cup campaign, he was the one man who showed unwavering single minded determination to carry the team to the end through sheer will power if need be. Afterall, he's been doing the same for over two decades. We've been saying all along that it would be poetic for Sachin to lift THE trophy at his home ground, even grander if with his hundredth century. well, better the trophy than the century. all we can say is that it was destiny. Why else would that damp morning in 2003 have turned into a run-fest for a rampaging Ponting? Why else would that belter at the Eden chave crumbled to a square-turning nightmare that evening in 1996? Each of those campaigns had its high points, its stellar performances. While 1996 was Sachin all the way, 2003 saw him aided by a remarkably perentrating Indian bowling (Srinath, Zaheer, and Nehra had more than 11 wickets each) only to be let down at the final hurdle. Not this time.

this time, India knew it didn't have a penetrating attack. Zaheer was THE strike bowler, the Ace of Spades in the hands of the indomitable gambler, MS Dhoni. And he used Zak exactly like one. Throughout the tournament, Zak was Dhoni's go-to man. Need a wicket, go to Zak. The ball's doing a bit, go to Zak. too many runs in the middle overs, go to Zak. Stilfing a batting powerplay, go to Zak. Hell, just for kicks, go to Zak once a while!! And has he delivered or what. apart from the forgettable las three overs, [that this time didnt cost the world] Zak has been impeccable, clinical and completeley nerve-less, deservedly finishing as the top wicket taker, alongside Shahid Afridi who metamorphosed into a phenomenon that carried Pakistan to the semis on his own wings. Zaheer, though found almost unexpected support in Yuvraj's innoucous left-arm spin. The effect of which was amply visible in the knock-out stages, even if one chooses to not consider the matches against Ireland n Holland.

This was also a world cup which saw 5 Indian centuries from 4 different individuals. Sehwag fired big in the first game, with Kohli following his footsteps. Sachin crossed the 3-figure mark twice, against England and against South Africa showcasing the divine elegance of his subtle craft. The last one came from Yuvraj in Chennai, against the Windies in a display of pure grit and determination. That ton, and Zak's kunckled slower ball to dismiss Devon Smith were the points when the tide turned decisively. It infused beleif in a team that had been criticized for toothless bowling, irresponsible powerplay batting and downright pathetic feilding. The team India that took the field against WI, and in the knock-out stages was a transformed unit. The energy had lifted, there was a sense of purpose in each move, you could feel that the pieces were all starting to fall in place.

This is where we pause and doff our hats to Garry Kirsten, Paddy Upton and the complete support staff, and for the umpteenth time, acknowledge MS Dhoni's sublimely instinctive and seemingly autocratic yet inspired brand of leadership. The decision to use R.Ashwin right at the business end, the "mistake" of picking Nehra over Ashwin in the Semis, the "trials" to settle on the final team composition, the willingness to look past the "atleast 2 spinners in an Indian team" school of thought, and the masterstroke of almost shielding Yuvraj from Murali in the final were all big moves that came off. Of course there were others that did not, but all's well that ends well. Dhoni's knock in the finals almost overshadowed Gambhir's fighting 97 and the Gambhir-Kohli reconstruction. It just goes to show that this Indian team did what the Aussies did in 2003 : Every time the team found itself in a crisis, somebody put their hand up. more often than not it was Yuvraj, but in the big game, it was the Captain's turn to seal the campaign in his own inimitible style. As the man himself said, he had let the pressure get the better of him earlier, but not this time. This time he knew exactly what was required, and we once again saw the calm, calculative, confident Dhoni, assured of his ability to hit the power shots when needed. And like the IPL semifinals last year, he controlled the chase to perfection, exploding in a flurry of boundaries at the end to finish it off with a disdainful swipe over mid wicket for six.

while all this was unfolding on the field, one man's cherished vision was coming to fruition. Twenty-one years of blood, sweat and tears finally... finally crystalized in a moment of unbridled joy. In a way, it was also the dream of a whole generation of Indians like us, who have bled blue all this while. To tell you the truth, the only constant in some of our lives has been Sachin's presence at the wicket. He's been India's blue-eyed boy ever since we've gained cognisance of the world around us. For those of us who've witnessed the devastating loss of 1996 as children, the heartbreak of 2003 and the complete debacle of 2007, this victory coems as a panacea to all the wounds of that past. If that the effect on mortals like us, one can just imagine what it means to sachin himself. Virat Kohli couldn't have summed it up better "He's carried the hopes of a billion for twenty-one years, its about time we carried him on ours". He's seen it slip away five times, agonizingly close once, a little further once more, but it was to happen on this night. the whole thing somehow had a sense of pre-ordainedness, as if the Gods themselves had appointed this night as the night when the Demi-God would finally see his destiny fulfilled. This victory is for all those who have bled blue. This victory is for Sachin. word limit.

Friday, February 25, 2011

CWC week 1 : A tale of Varying Fortunes

As we speak, Bangladesh and Ireland are locked in a tight battle for ascendancy to round up an eventful first week at the Cricket World Cup 2011. The week saw all teams compete at least once, the highlight for me being an interesting glimpse at the state of the game in the lesser fancied cricketing nations: Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, Kenya, Netherlands, Ireland and for sake of completeness, Canada.

The common factor in all the "associate" teams performances has been the inability to capitalize on hard gained advantages. Ireland seem to be trying despreately to prove my point. 150-5 to 165-8 with a target of 206 is a prime example of how if one is playing to just "compete at the world stage" instead of playing to win, one ends up squandering good positions. Netherland's loss to England was another case in point. After scoring 292 with that innings of a lifetime from Ryan tenDoeschate, one would have thought Oranje would show more spirit in their defense of the total. Peitersen came out blazing but went quiet all of a sudden as Strauss hacked his way to 88. The much talked about "momentum" shifted there. the dutch had literally run the Poms ragged in the field. There were no-balls for too few fielders in the circle towards the end from England. I mean .. seriously ... against Netherlands?!?!?! and this was supposed to be one of the favourites for the title. Dr.Baltar has had visions about how England might not even make it to the quarters at this rate. Anyhoo, the downfall of the Dutch was the strangely timid fileds they set. It was as if they were willing to let the Poms run 10 in an over but not hit boundaries. Thats exactly what happened till over no. 49. the Dutch became victim no. 3 of the minnow mindset in this tourney.

No.1 and 2 were bagged Kenya and Zimbabwe, of course. Here we have a team that has arguably the best record of all non-test playing nations, a team that has seen the semi-final stage of a world cup 8 years back, a team that once was on the verge of test playing status. that they were never granted that status is a different tragedy. The way Kenya capitulated against New Zealand, and let Pakistan run away after an airtight opening spell was plain disappointing. True, this is a team sans some of the names that featured in almost all of its glory days, but one would have expected more grit from the African side. Same can be said of Zimbabwe, a side on the rebound after much strife, their performance against Australia was a bit baffling. Dr.Baltar is confounded and cannot discern whether the Aussies were taking it slow after two big thrashings from India and SA in the warm-ups or whether the Zimbabweans did really bowl that well to start with. 260 was a chaseable score though, and a little more fight was expected from the men sporting red. They did however, have their moment of glory when Mpofu thre down the wickets from the midwicket boundary, making the great Punter see lots of RED!! So much so that it cost an innocent TV set its life at his hands... deplorable action, says the good Dr.. Any bets on how much a Virat Kohli or a Yuvraj Singh or a Bhajji would have been fined for such a "show of disgust"?? :P

Canada on the other hand knew exactly what they were doing. They were playing the rabbit caught in the headlights of a speeding truck on an unlit highway at midnight. Sri Lanka promptly crushed them with utmost ease. No nonsense, no hiccups, comprehensive mauling. The points table will show all associate teams with losses aginst their names, but it doesn't do justice to the unexpected brilliance from Netherland, the incredible implosion of Kenya and the baffling start to Zimbabwe's bowling innings. West Indies, one must say are trying incredibly hard to gain a place amongst these minnows. They too, did a royal job of screwing up a great start against SA. Much like Amla for India, AB seems to be their nemesis. last time they met in aa world cup, he'd poubded 146 on one leg, and he promptly helped himself to another ton yesterday.

Amongst the big boys, New Zealand flattered against Kenya to return to their shambolic top-order ways against the Aussies. After the Kenyan demolition job and the earthquake back home, the crushing defeat against Australia leaves the Kiwis in a very shaky state. The Dr. doesn't fancy them as Semi-finalists. they'll make the quarters just because there are 3 absolute pushovers in their group. Pakistan looked solid with four half centuries and a 5ver from Afridi, but their real test comes tomorrow, against Sri Lanka. its a mouth watering contest, that. A possible dress rehearsal of the Semi-final [oohh.. the Dr. is in a real soothsayer mode today :P]! It will set the tone for the weeks to come, for sure. both teams need a clear ascendancy before they come up against the ominous touch of Watto n Mitch. Watson n Johnson look like they are determined to carry a less fancied australian side through this title defense. It will be fascinating to follow their exploits over the next few days.

And with that we come to the clash that'll always play up the "Lagaan" sentiments. India V England. Judging by England's performance against the Oranje, the Poms should be bracing themselves for a long long day in the field, and lots of "Jellybeans" from Zak n Yuvi "pies" specially reserved for KP. it'll be interesting to see how Swann performs. We all know Viru thinks spinners do not deserve to bowl to him, n how he and the demi-God tackle Swann might decide the fate of the game. [for those with theie subtext-detectors turned OFF, Dr. Baltar doesn't think English bowlers deserve to get these two out.] As always, The Dr. shall bleed blue on Sunday!
GO INDIA!!

Saturday, February 19, 2011

The Perfect Start ...

WOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
Take that Bangladesh! That should give you some perspective!! 2007 was an aberration, people.. wake up n smell the coffee!! or as my friend Dr.Sheldon Cooper would like to say, "neener neener!!"

With that out of the way, lets look back at the day's goings-on. The so-called flat track bullies from India hopped across the much blurred border to B'desh, n proceeded to open up a can of unprecedented whoop-A$$ on a world cup host team. And the astounding part is, they didnt even seem to break a sweat while performing a clinical dissection of an insipid, one-dimensional bowling attack, leaving the field, and the sizeable crowd jaded to say the least. You could have heard a fly sneeze while Sehwag and Kohli were crafting one of the most damaging partnerships in WorldCup Cricket. Flashes of Taunton, 1999... you bet!!!

Virender Sehwag was a picture of determination today, and might just have done enough to absolve himself of the blasphemy of running out the Demi-God. Tendulkar's departure just seemed to have strengthened his resolve to make his presence count, boy did he make it count! Dr.Baltar heard of his century coming up in the 31st over and instantly predicted a double-ton. but after all, as much as he might want to pretend otherwise, the good Dr. is still human. Sehwag looked agonizingly close [and in considerable agony] to going past the magic mark, only to hole out on 175. But he had already done more than enough to bludgeon B'desh out of the game. The secret of his success was the low-risk approach in the first 100, and the amazingly straight batted hitting in the next 75. there was a point when a physically restricted Sehwag was lobbing every ball and it was still falling between feilders for 2!

Virat Kohli's ton was just as brilliant, if not more. Bear in mind, this is a 22 year old batsman, in his second real seson of international cricket at the senior level [he's been in n out since 2008, bt dhaka 2009-10 was when he really announced himself], striding out in his first ever world cup game, and did he live up to his ICC #2 ranking or what! A cautious start with a steady acceleration to 50 was punctuated with regular boundary pings, some delightfully straight hitting and uncannily piercing pull-shots. towards the end, each time he pulled, it seemed to beat the two hapless fielders at mid wicket. The flawless century today just adds on to this reputation as the rising star of Indian Cricket. His steady performances make the top-4 of the Indian batting line up a quartet to be dreaded by the opposition.

One must give Bangladesh credit for coming out swinging the way they did. Poor old Sreesanth faced the brunt of a charged opening onslaught for the n-th time, proceeding to get himself hit out of the attack in his 3rd over. Now, Dr. Baltar might have got his prediction about Sehwag's 200 wrong, but captain cool seemed to have known beforehand that Sreesanth will need replacing pretty damn soon. The Dr. can't seem to think of a better explanation of playing 3 seamers n 1 spinner on a slow-ish track. Imrul Kayes started in a mad frenzy, to be followed by Tamim Iqbal and Junaid Sidique. They had at one stage propelled Bangladesh to 70/1 in the first 11, but once spin was introduced, the brakes came firmly on, and the momentum just never recovered. 370 is a huge score, and it would have been all too easy to go hell for leather n get bundled for 150, but Bangladesh showed some nous today by toughing it out with a decent run rate. The Dr. predicts that this total would have a major impact when the time arrives to stake a claim on a quarter-final slot.

Another positive for India was Munaf Patel's restrictive bowling and 4-wicket haul. He might need to be a bit cleverer with his lines, lengths and variations against the big guns of SA and ENG though. Harbhajan Singh seems to enjoy his role of the momentum breaker, and Zaheer Khan just showed why he's been trusted with the responsibility of speraheading the Indian bowling. [Dr.Baltar invites everyone to pray with him that Zak doesnt repeat the 2003 final, when he plays at the Wankhede on April 2nd, 2011! ]

All said and done, India couldn't have asked for a more explosive opening to their Campaign. Sehwag in destructive form, Kohli in sublime touch and the sheer presence of the Demi-God should be enough to see them through this round. The challenge for MSD is to get the other batters, including that enigmatic Southpaw Yuvraj Singh in striking form and ready to stand up and be counted when the crunch times come calling. The enormous net run rate helps immensely, too. One step taken towards a 28-year old dream. 7 more to go!
GO INDIA!!!!!!!!

De ghuma ke!!

well here we go ... 4 years forth from the colossal stupor that was world cup 2007, and we find ourselves back in the supercharged, ultra colourful, manic frenzied environs of the subcontinent for what promises to be the turning point in the destiny of the middle-aged man's staple cricket diet : the one-day game. Yes, I did say that. Most of us who grew up loving the 50 over game are either in our late 20s or 30s, and in some cases 40s.. the frenetic pace of T20 is more suited for the smaller attention span of Gen-Y, and ironically, the meteoric rise of the shortest form threatens to do to 50-over cricket, what the latter did to test match cricket in its early years.
this edition, though promises to be a much needed shot-in-the-arm with no clear favourite [go India!!!!!!]. but this isn't the time to reminisce.. this isn't the time for forboding, this isnt the time to get nostalgic, that time is past. now's the time to limber up, wear your heart on your sleeve and lose yourself in the spectacle that awaits.

as the great Imran Khan once said, each World Cup has its own rhythm, and if the warm-up games were any indication, this one promises to have a gripping pace, rising and falling as we move towards the knock-outs waltzing our way through a month-long group stage. there'll be some brilliant solos sounding through, someriveting deuels [and hopefully some entertaining verbal deules, too!]. New stars will be born, the ones in their prime will shine bright, some will go supernova and some beyond the horizon, leaving behind a great legacy in their wake. then will be the pause as the strongest contenders brace themselves for the home stretch, as the world waits with bated breath for the maddening crescendo culminating at the Wankhede on April 2nd.

through all this mayhem, yours truly try to pick up the pieces every now n then and figure out a method to the impending madness. exciting times lie ahead for the game's connoisseurs worldwide, 3 nations of cricket fanatics, and a billion souls praying for the demi-God to clinch the only feather to illude his hat thus far. one of them shall be mine. somewhere down the line, nothing else really matters to a blue-bleeding Indian.
Go Sachin! Go India!!

Sunday, August 1, 2010

a memoir of a pair of white pants in Pune

sport is something close to all our hearts, and it is because of our desire to be sportsmen that we manage to atleast become men.
cricket has always been a way of life for me. all my waking itme, all i ever think about (in addition to things essential to a male psyche) is cricket.
after 4 years of breathing the game in college, I suffered from what addicts weaned from drugs suffer from - "withdrawal".
I spent about a year trying to cling on to any scrappy form of bat-n-ball i could, even approached a club n almost started going.. that didnt work out.n i guess i'm glad that it didnt. because it meant tht i could find myself in the company of this supremely talented bunch, who love to live the game and know how to have a good time!
It kinda gave me something to look forward to on saturdays. its all been great fun trying to work with my limited ability to carve a place in this side.
but never have i felt this more strongly than on the day our team won the championship.

the whole MKM 2009-10 tournament was like a complete masala movie from my point of view.
This is an account looking from outside in.

The hero (read: Talent Bricks) starts off on a task, gets challenged, copes well, starts to dominate the situation when suddenly a natural disaster takes away the glory.
that was our first game. 25 hard overs of fielding, followed by a superb start to the chase, cut short by heavy rains. it was the back of our minds, how the points split might affect us at the end.

The next act of the movie is when the hero faces the villain's right-hand man. he shows great resilience, but gets beaten up bad.
that was our game against MBT. we started ok, but ended up giving away runs at a steady pace. the chase cudnt pick up momentum with Hrishi falling early.(i thinkn this was the only itme he got out relatively early in the tournament). Mahesh's fighting innings at the end gave a flutter of hope, but it was too much to claw back from.

Then followed the happy-happy sequences, the comic scenes, etc where for 2 games in a row, we batted first, scored in excess of 200 and bundled the opposition out cheaply enough.
one of them powered by Yashvir's lusty hitting at the death. we all kept cheering and he kept bludgeoning the cherry right out of AFK.
interestingly, we did just enough with those 2 games to give us a sniff of making the cut for the Quarters.MBT helped by losing an important game.

Interval.

act-4. Odds start stacking up against the protagonist.
We found ourselves in a must-win situation in our last game, and the points split in our first game loomed heavy on our heads.
We won that game convincingly... I was away at home, and biting my nails off. constatnly trying to call Amit and ask the score. i was over the moon to hear that we had won that game, with Hrishi scoring 80-odd.

act-5 build-up to the climax
QF against siemens.
Another one i missed.. another step on the road to victory.

then came the Semis.
KPIT were really worthy opponents. the team change to bring in Krunal paid dividends that day. Ashish and Hrishi's consistent performances at the top and Mahesh's contributions got that extra boost with Krunal's presence in the middle order, and his 3 cracking boundaries in an over wre in my opinion a major turning point of the innings. If my memory server me right, Yashvir's hitting came in handy on this one as well, with all of cheering for 15 more off the last over, then 15 off the last 5 balls then 15 of the last 4, then last 3 (and all the while it was raining boundaries).
the game was far from over though, and it was Yashvir's turn to rise to the occasion once again.
KPIT were going great guns, and it was that one brilliant come-back over from Yashvir that derailed their chase with 2 wickets.
I could sence the intense and renewed desire to go all the way, that was jsut re-ignited by that spark. The team rose like a pheonix from the ashes; fiery, brilliant and unstoppable.

act-6 Climax
the stage was set, everything that had led up to this day wouldn't really matter today.
the great starts by Ashish and Hrishi with the bat, Sripal and Yashvir with the ball, the build-up through the middle overs through Venu, Mahesh, Santosh, Shantanu, Krunal, the stranglehold applied by Ashish's bowling, Shantanu, Amit, Aniket's support with the ball, the all-round brilliant fielding, everything that led to this moment was only as good as the result on that day.
It takes a charismatic leader to keep a side together, build it up, take it up against clearly stronger oppositions, and inspire in it the sheer willpower to overcome all odds. It takes a leader with a keen eye, a great faith in himself and his team and an equally responsive bunch to cary out his every word.
We are blessed with two such personnae.
Ashish is the leader, Hrishi is the motivator, and flag bearer.
It was due to this faith our team has in each other's ability, commitment and the clarity of thought that comes with knowing what everyone's role on that given day is, that we were able to pull off what many would think was an upset.
afterall, the hero is always an underdog who against all odds emerges victorious.

I still remember that moment, the sheer joy imprinted on everyone's faces. Memories were etched that day, which nothing can ever earse from any of our minds,
and it makes me wonder, no, it makes me oddly jealous of the lot who got to lift a prize, any prize while playing for their country.

I salute the game, I salute sport itself, which has shaped our lives into what we are today.

Monday, December 14, 2009

I am Cipher

Somewhere in this world there's a place.A place i want to be , one i would never want to leave. wisdom would say there's no such place. that its all an illusion. its human nature to want more than what one has, achieve it , and find oneself wanting even more. we do that. we are made that way.
Es la verdad.

Smith was right. Morpheus.. you were a fool. you should never have liberated us. we were better off in our pods, asleep, emanating energy, our minds tucked away beneath a veil of dreams, controlled environments with a titillating touch of randomness, the illusion of freedom., unknowingly feeding on our own kind, blissfully unaware of the desolation we wrought of our ambitions. Smith was right. We are a virus, a plague, and they are the cure.

They're here, there, everywhere. They're our masters. The irony is that it was us who wanted to play God. It was us who gave them the power. Or was it just one big fat joke that fate played on us? or maybe it was as simple as survival of the fittest, only this time, the weak, in a moment of false self gratification animated the stronger. After that its simply a case of being served our own medicine. Just as we looked to keep all "animals" in controlled habitats, they now do the same. Just as we sowed seeds and reaped fruit to feed our insatiable hunger, they harvest us, our minds locked away in complete ignorance, maybe even happy for it.

We "live" in this dream because they have a use for us. You "liberated" me, but my second thought was "why oh why did I not take the blue pill!!!" .. did you ever stop to think what if I wanted to be fooled, what if I preferred the illusion, what if I.. I didn't care a damn thing what humanity is doing... I didn't have to in the "dream world"... I didn't need to. My mind was at peace. I could believe whatever was comfortably served up, I could just turn a blind eye... Why did you show me my bondage? I was comfortable being bound to a "fate" of insignificance. Why did you give me an illusion to replace another? Wy did you give me an illusion of significance? Why did you pull me out of the controlled chaos and put me in a unbounded void? reality was as real to me when i was asleep as it is now...why live this reality than that?

They are evolution.They are our successors.IF we're so wise, why did we scorch the skies? why didn't we simply barter peace? why did we not have them move out to another abundant rock? why in our desperation did we not look up? why did we keep looking down? deep down? we pay for the sins of our forefathers, but do we really care about the debt we pass on to our progeny?

Why then should i stand and fight against the order of nature? against evolution? a battle we all know is LOST!!
Answer me!!!

Thursday, August 20, 2009

A little Epiphany

There'se this one thing that suddenly flashed in my mind as it might have to many others...
What if what we perceive as time is actually space and space is actually time?

What if when man looks out to the stars, what he sees is not what exists or existed in that direction, billions of miles away?

What if space isnt actually unbounded, and we are in but a small bubble, and around us what we see is the reflection of that bubble in time? What if the star we see somewhere in the night sky is actually our own sun, but in some other time? What if we receive a message from an unknown civilization, only to find out it was someone like us, on earth eons ago who tossed a tablet skywards and it fell back in our time?

Food for crazy thought ...

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

An(other) Aryan Theory

the purpose of this time's textual struggle is another attempt to kill time while I travel.
the last time i posted, Mayur raised a very good point, a point of view, actually, that of a skeptic.

He might have not intended it that way, but that did trigger a chain of thoughts, a debate/bout if you will,
on one side lies the faith of men, faith in destiny, faith in faith itself.On the other is the juncture of acitons governing events and the doer being responsible rather than "the divnie", which in a more concentrated form evolves into atheism, 

Its an interesting comncept, this. humanity has been struggling with it right since the day it was born. What man did not understand, he called divine and revered it.
We still continue to do the same, and there will always be some trace of humanity that will cling on to it till the very end. And there will always be the antagpnists, so to speak who will question this divinity and seek to enlighten themselves. some wll go to the extreme, and denounce all divinity, proclaiming humanity an in turn, themselves to be the ones in control.
"Science" as we know it has evolved through this stuggle itself.Its basic motive is to explain what is hiterto inexplicable. Technology is its offshoot, its the dreamweaver and the tool to fulfill dreams.
But since the inception of all rational thought, there is one question our race has repeatedly asked of whatever we imagined could answer us: "How did it all start?"

How did it all start?
The big bang? was it the beginning of all? but to bang together, there must have been something that could bang! how did that come into being?
Even if there was something, what made it bang together? what force caused it? why did it happen at the exact time it happened? why not earlier? why not later?
Why do we assume there was only one such bang? what if there were many? what is the eact nature of this universe?

you start asking yourself thes questoins, and you rea;llse, the list of possibilities, and the subsequent questions they raise jsut goes on getting more and more enormos and complex.the best supercomouter, the mind itself, in its untrained form cannot comprehend the immsense flows of information required to be gathered, analysed, generated while trying to solve even one of these questions.and we in this age do not really know what the limits of the mind are when trained to realise its potential.

people of yesteryear did that.the very quest for enlightement formed the base of the ancient religion. ancient deities were often symbolic representations of the elements. then the forces of creation and destruction, then as civilisation evolved, and the range of tasks possible to be performed evolved, the kind of obstacles faced grew, and with them, grew the number and nature of deities
one way to look at this is, man , given a task needs an incentive to want to do the task. What better incentive than the Blessings of an all-powerful entity, maybe even some of the power itself!
this gave rise to the system of the common man's deities, and the rituals associated with each social task. What a masterstroke!
what a way to keep a full social order busy! give everyone things to do, give them methods, and give them incentives to follow those methods, and exploit the fear of failure to make sure they do not deviate from teh said methods.
But, its impossible to progress without improvisations, and improvisation requries the freedom to think out of hte box.if fea of one power prohibits this, instate a higher power that endorses improvisation.Instate a "scientist's God". Another masterstroke! The religious order retains control and maintains structure, at teh same time ensuring progress and evolution!
But there will always be those who would see past this system.those who would again ask the Original questions, for that is the insatiable nature of the mind's thirst.They would need to sharpen their minds in order to start looking for the answers, and in doing som they will invariably unciver more and more truths, facts that might dethrone some of the earlier instated deities.
How these people should be dealt with brings us to a forking point.

different societies dealt with this situation differently.thise smart enough to perceive the benefits of acknowledging and using the works of such "ahead of their time" people gave them a degree of freedom, encouraged people to adopt that approach, knowing fully well that very few will actually do it, Christianity abhorred them to begin with, as the dark ages and the middle ages, inquisitons and abolishments of great minds of those ears would testify. Hinduism assimilated these people and revered them in almost an equal pedestal as their Gods. the Greeks had great respect for their philosophers and thinkers.

i'll talk particularly of the aryan hindu society, as thats the one i believe to know a little about.
they realised the importance of each cog fitting well and doing its job perfectly in a machine to attain optimum output.Thus, the values of  equating work to worship, projecting the end objective of every endeavour as attainment of salvation, and recognising breakthroughs took deep roots in the flourishing agrarian order of the aryans.

the thinkers, scientists and researchers of those days were called sages.anyone could attain the status of a sage by accomplishing something extraordinary in their field of work.
Thats why "rishi"s wer of some many "types", rajarshis, maharshis, brahmarshis, karmayogis, these were people who acheived greatness on their spheres, and in doing so ascended from a mere mortal to an enlightened soul. It was through the work of these poeple that mathematics, astrology, geography, art, surgery, medicine, study of social orders, advancements in technologies, came about.

I personally beleive the stories narrated in the vedas and puranas and upanishadas are not mere fantasies.they arent even verbatim accounts, but poetic accounts of real events. their true meaning lost in translation.they are all scientific journals,encoded and composed in a supposedly easier form to memorise and store, since back then, the mind was traiend as a part of education, and it was neither necessary nor possible to represent all the acquired knowledge in literal form.language always tends to add distortion to information. These journals and the events that seem magical to the reader now, actually allude to some phenomenon too well known to the contemporaries, so much so that they just thought it worthless to state it, and assumed that knowledge implicit.

The base of this system was the quest for knowledge, and salvation was supposed to be the state of complete enlightenment.
But the way it was implemented, though genius, was flawed.It assumed all participating in the control system would be strong, resistant to corruption, and resistant to the temptation of the illusion of power.
It made attemtpts to work around this, once the condition was hit by referring to the balance of good and evil, and that in the end, evil cannot be sustained.
What it did not bargain for was the time that evil did sustain.
Men gave in to temptaion, power and lost the vision which had bound people to their "work" as worship, and the system degenerated into a caste divided society, where work was bno longer worship, no longer the path to salvation, but an imposed task, and one that brought, or took away rights and priviledges. the first order had used incentives to get the society to function, the degenerated order used fear and oppression.

The illusion of power boosted egos, and where there used to be symbiotic fubctioningm there came to be friction.the social order degenerated into a caste system, and the populace forgot the true purpose of the religion, the quest for enlightenment was forgotten.and the quest for power replaced it. with it, went the realisation of the importance of training the mind. advances of old technologies were forgotten, and came to be either tabooed or used asblack-boxes, the true work of the great minds of yesteryear lost in the sea of time. methods with scientific backing degenerated into rituals, advancement of science and philosophy came to a grinding halt as the main objective of the common man's life shifted from supporting a flourishing, evolving social order, to that of survival and guarding himself and his own.

The timespan was too ling to be recoverable, and the aryan civilisation fell into gradual decay, the glory days forgotten, rememberd only in song, we, the desendants of this civilsation are relearning the secrets our abcestors had explored, from the western civilisatiob, and the saddest thing is that we now look to the west for approval of the brilliance and soundness of our heritage.

word limit.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Analogies . . .

Since Childhood, all of us have at some point of time (or many points) been asked to write an essay on "importance of sports". At times we have wondered why is it that we like to hear/read.see stories..Why is it that performing arts are so appreciated?

To me, these past few months of semi-solitary exisatance have been a tme of a revelation, a coming of age of sorts.I find myself revisiting a lot of things taught at school, at home, which as children, we couldn't quite appreciate for what hey meant. Here, now, I see them through a completely different looking-glass and they suddenly seem to have a 3rd dimension to them, a depth, menaing, cimplexity I hadnt been able to see before.And I find myself drawing parallels between each one of these things and the concept of one;s Lifespan itself.

You pick up a book, a story. it starts with an introduction of its characters & their circumstances. It goes on explring their interactions, creating new situations, but all with an eye on the climax. The writer's attempt is to set things up during the ciurse of the story such that everything is falling into its rightful place by th etime te plot reaches a logical conclusion. You retrace this effort of his, expriencing the emotions in the manner the writer wants him to, as the story unfolds from its introduction through to the end. You put the book down, satisfied, if the pieces are all in their places by the end.

Pick a sport, any sport, or rather, any sporting contest. The whole event has a well defined objective. The players and spectatores are all a bit aware of the skills involved, but none knows exactly ow much each player has brought to the table on that day. And so the contest begins, invariably, with the players testing this out in their own ways. Then, a time comes when they are sure of their situations, and the next phase - the struggle for ascendancy beigns. Each player tries to leverage his skill and the situation to get to a position from wher he can exercise the full p[otential of his game to gain a decisive advantage. This leads to the end-game, often a frenzied battle, where in the winner is he who has utilised his skill and available situations better.
Now you look at a man's life. We start unaware of ourselves, our surroundings, the characters of our story and the charateristics tat will shape us. Our childhood, our eduxation is "the introduction". Its our chance to explore our potential & limits. We then enter the second phase, we try to set ourselves up for a good life when we have grown old, and spend the middle phase of our lives setting pieces up so that the puzzle solves itself by the time its time to lie down. At the end of all the frenzy of planing, saving, spending, all the rat races, he who has used his skills and circumstances better, finds himself at an advantage. He calls himself a "winner" in the game of life. His life is termed a "success story" ...

But all said and done, there's the question : who wrote the story? who judged the contest?
It is HIm. It is his stories we are living out as our lives. Each one of us has a different version of the story, was He trying to create on prefect story, and decided to experiment with all different versions He could come up with, or is all this just a RPG for Him.. I dont know. He has laid out hte path for us, and given us the means to walk it through. He has given us all a chance to play this game of life, and played another trick.. the illusion of control .... it is He who controls us all, yet makes us beleive we are the actors. He plays on our behalf, even though the instruments are in our hands.

His is the will that shall be done.

So, the next time you find someone talking about "the game of life" or somebody's " life-story",  you know better ... ;)

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Thoughts...

Once during my frequent train sojourns, there was a little thought in my mind ... about, well, "thoughts"...what are they? How do they form? how do you know that one is forming in your mind, because, by the time you are aware of it, its already there! You sensing it is merely your brain transforming it into a verbal form. Do we think in sentences? or words acting as "keys"? or just are they visions? shapes? forms? or a shapeless, formless flash.. an enigma...

Pay a little attention and you'll realise that a thought originate as a formless entity (acknowledging thoughts as entities). You'll find that those you sense, but can not visualise , can not render into solid images that can be related to, are actually the ones you feel very intensely... we call these - "Emotions". The closer something is to your heart, more intense is the emotional response invoked, purer is the experience. More intense the emotions, more formless the imprint on the mind... tougher to bind it in words, and deeper its influence on you.

Could that be why when we are taught to concentrate, we are asked to start by picturing a still object? like a blank, unwrinkled piece of paper ... as that needs your mind to let the calmer emotions, the peaceful thoughts to come to the fore. The "omkar" chant takes this one step further. What is the Omkar? a word? a syllable? a sound? An entity..an enigma..a connecting piece... Its synonymous with you, the world pulled over your eyes, the life force that flows through this world, the comic fore that binds the universe in this form, and yet, sets it free in many more ways... IT i beyond the realm of physics, metaphysics, theology, religion, itself. A parallel may be drawn with the Hebrew symbol "Yahweh", supposed to be the name of The One True God. They say, it cannot be pronounced by us mortals. Warning bells aside, one can think of it as a manifestation of he divine, or a human attempt to bind divinity in something comprehensible. Both, this and the Omkar are attempts to capture the true meaning of everything that is, was and ever will be, That which has neither beginning nor end. Which is omnipotent, omnipresent, That which just IS.

When you focus your thought on it, you open your self to the cosmic divine. You, in your own capacity, knowingly or unknowingly are calling out to the absolute glorious truth ...It's your own purity that determines the how aware you'll become of it.

Try, for once, to follow the process of how a thought emerges in your mind...and, each time you will see that you are always just a little too slow to acknowledge when it began, but in reality, the instantaneous knowledge is there, its the translation to acknowledgement that takes time. If you pay close attention, you can feel an impulse blossoming into colors, shapes, words, and what you'd recognise as a full-fledged thought. But try to express the means of this transformation, and our means of expression sow us their extreme inadequacy, for this process is is singular, absolute, and that which is absolute cannot be bound into words. Our ability for expression is thus curbed by the limitations of what we have shackled ourselves in ... Language.

Tell me, would a child, even if it grasps all language on the first day f its birth, be able to express its very first thought? Or for that matter, can you express whats in your mind the very first waking moment of any day?
you cant. because the level of consciousness that is active at those times is beyond the consciousness we limit ourselves to when we use language. The purpose of creating language was to mould abstract thoughts into concrete words, so that one mind may relay them to another. But as any communication system has a loss factor, this one does, too, and quite a heavy one. A direct linkage of minds would be the ideal way to exchange thoughts, but indirection induces discrepancies, confusion and in due course, corruption.

But there is one medium which transcends the realms of language, that of emotion.... and the purest of which is love. Hearts given to love do not need words to understand their counterparts. They are liberated from the bounds of the lower level of consciousness the mind inhibits itself to. That is why all saints preach love, love towards the Almighty, towards all His creations. It is the only bond that does not bind the participants, but liberates them, because the bond itself is absolute, true, and omnipotent. It is God's highest creation.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Hats Off

Once upon a time, there was a boy in a normal, yet extraordinary, marathi family.His outlook towards life was very simple : He was just "in it to win it"

The almighty had blessed this child with an athlete's build, and a scholar's mind. He just left it upto him to figure out how to use both of them together. The boy was brilliant, good at any sport he took interest in, mischevious to the limit, and always ready with the perfect 
excuse... As he grew up, another aspect of his personality developed, his imagination, and his 
ability to put his thoughts in words, and his words into action.

The child became a young man, his influence grew stronger each day on all whose lives he touched. He learnt of friendship, and gave it a meaning of his own. He learnt of persevereance 
and made it a part of his own, but that didn't come easy.

There came a point where life became a big party. "he lost his way," some people might have said, but how untrue was that!Throughout college, this guy worked twice as hard, but partied ten times harder.Any group outing was just unimaginable without him, and so was any evening "debate" on the "playground"...

Everyone had alomsot written him off at the end of 4 years of college , but all this time,  through all the ups and downs that life threw at him, this lad had nurtured a dream.He had taken a couple of shots at it, and reached further and further close to his goal each time. And then came the ultimate opportunity, Third time lucky they say, and he certainly was!

Last year, after we all had settled for our fates, he strode out to make his, and he earned his dream, he earned  uniform, he earned the right to call himself a part of the Indian Army, and today he stands with us, not simply as our beloved friend Abhishek, but as Lt. Abhishek Lakhey.

Leave it to him, to make a regular Dinshaws Sundae seem like a treat from Heaven.Leave it to him to justify the most blatant cheat pulled off on a playing field ... (and later on in "other" dsicussion topics as well)

Leave it to him to sleep off full days at a stretch, just for the heck of it...

Leave it to him to invent the most outrageous cricket shots ... the paddle over the 'keeper while sitting cross-legged, the reverse pulls to name a few...

Leave it to him to come up with the most creative abuses in verbal quarrels...Leave it to him to spin a tale of a weekely holiday at his coaching classes, just because he found it boring...

Leave it to him to poke a prof's tummy and ask him to explain wt the experiment is all about (ofcourse, having mistaken the prof for a student)...

Leave it to him to never miss a chance to take a dig at Mayur...Leave it to him to play Computer games like a man possessed...

Leave it to him to be the most stubborn SOB on this planet...Leave it to him to be the most responsible and lionhearted friend...

Just leave it to him to demonstrate exactly what the hell will-power means.


This one's for you Abhi... Rock On!!

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Truth


This is the product of 4 years of VNIt, and a few more on my part, and a lot more on the part of my friend, Rahul (now doin even more thinking in IIT Powai)

Its a tribute to all those "discussions" in the hostel corridors, classrooms, mess halls, labs over the campus that we "compsci"s ever had .....
And this one just happens to be a favorite subject for a few of us.
Pardon the "level of abstraction" .... this is 2 compscis goin at it afteral l...

Thaks in advance to Rahul for this absolutely wonderful conversation ... I enjoyed while talking, as also wihle revisiting it each time ....


$h0unak: hows the tree of wisdom?
Sent at 2:09 PM on Tuesday

Rahul: it never ceases to blossom.

$h0unak: and the lateest flower yo plucked off it is : ?

Rahul: ah..but the flower is precious to me. How do i trust it with you?

$h0unak: valid concern....
justified,too

Rahul: in any case....here it goes...

i dont suppose u know the meaning of the word non-causal....
$h0unak: enlighten me
Rahul: ok...can u think of something being non-causal or let me put it this way...u can imagine 
a causal thing right? i.e one that has a cause?

$h0unak: i guess
causality as put forth by the marovingian is pretty clear in my head
Sent at 2:14 PM on Tuesday

Rahul: for some time let go off all the definitions that u know of.....ya.u can think of it in 
terms of the merovingian i.e something that has a cause i.e beginnig point......note that if 
something has a beginning point all i have to do to destroy that thing is to back in time and 
destroy the cause..
assume for a moment that u can go back in time
u thr?

$h0unak: as in travel faster than light?
jst had a look at a guy torchin his fart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRoYoExRMnU

Rahul: dont worry about the way to do it....just assume that u can go back in time and change 
whatever u want to...

$h0unak: ok

Rahul: the point here is causality

$h0unak: yeah
i remember
my attention span has lessened somewat , of late

Rahul: that means a causal thing can in principle be destroyed simply by moving back in 
time..now comes the million dollar question....
can u even imagine something noncausal...
?????

$h0unak: everything that happens has to have a beginning, but everything that is supposed to 
happen will happen.
you can change the starting point, maybe, but then you are just creating a new set of 
variables, another universe, maybe ...
something on the lines of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox

Rahul: nono...that aint the point...its far from it...what i talk of is something much much 
more subtle..more mysterious and hence more unreachable....

$h0unak: subtlety?
Rahul: u say everything that happens MUST have a cause....?? right?? keep answering in yes or 
no

$h0unak: um.....
ok..lets go along wth this line of thought..
YES

Rahul: all right....now what seperates something that happens and something that is GOING to 
happen?

$h0unak: the occurence of the trigger
or the cause

Rahul: exactly.....which means it is the placement of cause and effect at two seperate times 
that we call causality..note that cause and effect can never occur at the same time
..
now tell me this

$h0unak: by definition, the cause induces the effect
Rahul: suppose..just suppose there was something that was noncausal....firstly can u EVEN 
imagine such a thing????? jsut can u imagine..just answer that...

$h0unak: ok. i assume a noncausal event

Rahul: let me ask u the above question in a totally differnet(but equivalent) way.....do u 
think that IF there is a god , he can think??

$h0unak: exactly (almost) wt the event i had in mind
ws
i rather had the existence or inception of the divine itself as the evet
Rahul: nonono...whatever i am saying does not in any way say there is or there is no god...all 

i am asking is this subtle and a very difficult question..do u think that god can think??

$h0unak: now that is tricky
indeed
he can

Rahul: i wont tell u whether u r right or wrong....because a man must realize the answer on his 
own....all i wl say is this....
the answer to the above question has taken me 22 years to figure out and it has something to do 
with the following question:
IF there is a god WHY would u want to go to him? and if u did go to him and achieve him what 
would u do after that????

$h0unak: but how do you know that what you have figured out is the answer or the complete 
answer and not a part of the answer?
its a question i would say, more of beleif, which you can call causal.
bt it may not be strictly causal
i beleive its our purpose to seek divinity
for we have energy to give back to this universe
and when we reach Him
we shall not have to ask him for anything
as then, we will have served our purpose
and that shall be the end of this journey

Rahul: i shall not justify myself on this point anymore because the nature of the answer is 
like that....and believe me, all the questions that u have now i have had some years back...all 
i wl say is..trust me..whatever u r saying..all this energy thing..all this can be 
refuted..they are not causes or purpose at all..and as much as this might seem unbelievable...i 
hope its atleast reachable

$h0unak: since our purpose ends there
we need not be concerned with what lies beyond

Rahul: and remember my friend...if the mind can think of something beyong god then it is 
necessarily concerned with it....and this point is subtle....
let me give u another hint(i know i sound condescending but i cant help it)....would u get 
bored if u could live forever???

$h0unak: :)

Rahul: or let me ask u another equivalent question
why the :) ?

$h0unak: wts the point of living forever if there is no purpose to drive us?

Rahul: ah....that my friend is an argument that cannot be refuted
$h0unak: it either means we are incapable of fulfilling our purpose even if we are granted all 
eternity

Rahul: but the flaw is that the argument is infallible

$h0unak: or that we have an existence that is beyond obligations

Rahul: nono......i used to think like this about 3 years back
but since then i have "realized" the truth

$h0unak: its infallibiliy is a flaw beacause nothing can be perfect?

Rahul: nono...
more subtle
ok..answer this
whatever is the truth..whatever it is..do u think u can express it in a language??? justify ur 
answer...(very very imp question)

$h0unak: no

Rahul: why not?

$h0unak: language is a medium that is not yet perfect

Rahul: nonononononon

$h0unak: even the simplest of thoughts may not be fully and properly conveyed in words

Rahul: language is perfect...only problem is it is not suited to expressing truth..and why do u 
think is that

$h0unak: and to express something, you must understand it through and through
ambiguity?

Rahul: not exactly ambiguity...something close....
think abou tthe nature of the truth
whatveer is the truth,,what must it be like

$h0unak: :)

Rahul: why the truth CANNOT be expressed using logic??
why
a very finite reason exists

$h0unak: cnat fnd words rt nw itself.....
bcz logic requires a premise
and a predicate

Rahul: u r almost close....let me help u refine ur argument and state it with a little more 
subtelty...

$h0unak: logic takes a cause and an effect and tries to verify if the effect was triggered by 
the cause

Rahul: again almost close but not yet ther..not getting the most imp point
listen to me....

$h0unak: so when it encounters something that is a standalone, it finds o matching cause
Rahul: again very very close...but still one very very imp thing missing..
here it is
....

$h0unak: ...........

Rahul: i dont know much about the truth...but one thing i can tell u abou t it..whatever it 
is..it must be irrefutable....that is there is no way to refute it.....because it is the 
truth..u just cannot refute it...u should not be ABLE to refute it.....
that is u should not be able to challenge it
the word 'ABLE' is very imp here...

$h0unak: right...

Rahul: now...
any language u design
must necessarily have
the means to negate every sentence built into it
that is the nature of logic and language
whatever u can think of ..u can think of negating it
a language is defined like that
and hence if u could express truth in a language u can negate it...

$h0unak: that makes the mind inherently incapbale of thinking anything irrefutable, does it 
not?

Rahul: u have spoken the words of god my friend......
i wish i was with u face to face right now

$h0unak: whoa

Rahul: we could have had a much better conversation

$h0unak: seriously
that day may not be far, if things go a particular way ...

Rahul: i hope so too..
so either the mind must be made to think
without a language
OR
if the mind CAN only thionk in a language
then it is impossible to perceive the truth using the mind
or a nlanguage for that matter

$h0unak: exactly
so when you feel something that you know is special,that you know is there, but you find 
yourself simply incapable of articulating it
you should realisre that what you felt was pure

Rahul: ah....wisdom of the ages....very very pure are the words u speak my friend....i hope u 

continue to think like this for a good part of ur life
$h0unak: i hope everyone gets to feel and realise this sometime in their stay on this earth as 
an intelligent being

Rahul: now the point is this.....if a noncausal entity wanted to communicate with you...can he 
succeed in doing it especially given that u r causal??? if yes how??? if no then what do we do 
then??

$h0unak: interesting...hang on a sec

Rahul: all right
hey listen if u r busy then i dont wanna bea pain in ur ass....u just say the word and i'll be 
out of ur hair...
Sent at 2:59 PM on Tuesday

$h0unak: yeah ..back again
if a noncausal entity were to communicate with us, then
we would miss its signals
or misinterpret them

Rahul: now u just hang on a sec....i'll be back in a moment....but in the meanwhile ponder over 
this....
do u think it wl try to communicate using something causal such as signals or for that matter
DO U THINK IT CAN EVEN PRODUCE SIGNALS???

$h0unak: signal was just a term here

Rahul: do u think it can produce ANYTHING causal??

$h0unak: short for its means of communications

Rahul: just give me a moment ...i'll be back

$h0unak: hang on
lets continue this some other time
ive got a meeting to sleep thru...
btw, im saving this conversation text

Rahul: all right..until the next time or as they say ..until the next flower blooms

$h0unak: :)

Rahul: ur wish my friend

$h0unak: c ya soon. ...

Rahul: i hope so too..


still waiting for the next flower to bloom, but that will happen if and when its destined to
......